Micromax was having a desire run with its Fabric sequence smartphone. While Fabric II A110 – the second cellphone in the Fabric sequence – put the focus on Micromax, the Fabric HD A116 was a smash hit even before its release in Indian. Micromax Fabric HD A116 was marketed out within time of its release, creating it perhaps the only smartphone in Indian to offer out so fast. Even the Fabric A110 was marketed out from the market and is still being requested. Fabric A110’s price also increased from Rs 9,000 to Rs 11,500 as need increased considerably. But amongst all this brouhaha, UMI, a China system source, released a cellphone that has such great end functions that it could even put cell cellular phones costing Rs 35,000 to pity.
The cellphone in conversation is the UMI X2, which is costing Rs 14,000 only. The UMI X2 comes with a 5 inches high-definition show, quad primary processer, 2 GB RAM, 13 mega-pixel back photographic camera, 3 mega-pixel front side photographic camera, 2500 mAh power provide and a lot more. But the query is whether you should go for the Micromax Fabric HD or the UMI X2 as both are cost similarly. We have already analyzed the Fabric HD so we are in a excellent place to discuss its performance, and we anticipate to evaluation the UMI X2 soon. Here is a simple evaluation of functions of both the devices that will help you choose the right cellphone for yourself.
Micromax Fabric HD A116 is a really thin phone-elegant to be accurate. It has a bright yet non-slippery body system. As opposed to other price range cell cellular phones, Fabric HD has a excellent develop and does not feel inexpensive. Of course, it isn’t the thinnest 5 inches smartphone; nor the least heavy at 10.7 mm width and with a weight of 156 grms. However, UMI X2, which too has a 5 inches show, is just 8.9 mm dense and is 155 grms. In the pictures, UMI X2 looks excellent with a metal remove around its factors. However, it is difficult to say about the actual characteristics of its construction as of now.
The UMI X2 comes with a 5 inches show. However, the UMI X2 has 1920 x 1080 pixel quality as opposed to 1280 x 720 pixel quality of the Micromax smartphone. Of course, the pixel solidity is more on the UMI X2 and pictures look better and better on it. To be particular, UMI X2 has 441 ppi show quality, which is a lot better than The apple company iPhone 5’s 326 ppi solidity and New samsung Universe SIII’s 306 ppi pixel solidity. However, Micromax Fabric HD has 294 ppi pixel solidity. Both the cellular phones have IPS sections, but UMI X2 ratings over the Micromax Fabric HD as it has a Gorilla Cup 2 show which provides some kind of security to the display from scrapes.
Micromax Fabric HD comes with an 8 mega-pixel back photographic camera with double LED display and auto-focus. There is a 2 mega-pixel photographic camera in the top side. The cameras are in theory able to catch high-definition pictures and video clips but as we have outlined in our evaluation as well, Fabric HD is like most other price range cell cellular phones when it comes to the photographic camera. In fact, we discovered a bug in the smartphone that stops the photographic camera app from starting. UMI X2, on the other side, looks interesting with its 13 mega-pixel auto-focus back photographic camera with single LED display and 3 mega-pixel front side photographic camera. Determine sensible, the UMI X2 anyway looks better than the Micromax system, but it is a classification where numbers are deceiving.
Where storage space is involved Micromax Fabric HD is a reasonable system as it has 4 GB of storage space space of which 1.77 GB is available for the customer. One can also increase the storage space up to 32 GB using a small SD cards. But when as opposed to UMI X2’s storage space space, Fabric HD looks very common. This is because, the UMI X2 comes with a huge 32 GB ROM, of which we anticipate that around 25-28 GB will be available for customers to store their information. Besides, the UMI X2 has assistance for a small SD cards as well through which you can increase the storage space by another 32 GB.
Battery and Back Up time
Both cellular phones come with 5 inches displays as well as quad primary processor chips so their specifications are similar. That is why the 2500 mAh power provide in UMI X2 looks a lot better than the 2000 mAh power provide of Micromax Fabric HD. As I said in the evaluation as well, Fabric HD gives around five time of talktime with one full renew. We anticipate the UMI X2 to provide more talktime as it has a larger power provide, which should last around 6-7 time at the least.
Processor, OS, RAM
Both the devices come with the same MediaTek processer which has four cores and 1.2 GHz clockspeed. Also, both UMI X2 and Micromax Fabric HD A116 have Android os 4.1 Jam Vegetable os, and both the unit produces have guaranteed to release Android os 4.2 upgrade for the cell cellular phones in due course of time. What creates the UMI X2 special is its 2 GB RAM against Fabric HD’s 1 GB RAM.
Many a times, we discovered that cell cellular phones do not act as per their specifications. But if a cellphone indeed provides as its functions recommend, then UMI X2 is certainly the best cellphone under Rs 20,000. We have used the Micromax Fabric HD A116 substantially so we know it is a very excellent cellphone. But apart from its performance, the service system of Micromax (which is predicted to be better than that of UMI in Indian,) creates it a little bit far better buy the Fabric HD. Since UMI is a more recent entrant in the unit business in Indian, its system is changing. We will soon come out with a complete evaluation of UMI X2, soon after which we can say for sure which one is better, but feature-wise the champion is apparent. Micromax should fear more about creating its Fabric HD easily obtainable. Currently it is having difficulties to make both Fabric A110 and Fabric A116 available to customers. If it can’t take care of the provide problem soon, it would not be amazing to see people moving to other devices.